AI Visibility Software
← Blog
Published AI Visibility editorial

Temso vs Peec AI (2026): Which AI Visibility Platform Actually Closes the Gap?

Temso vs Peec AI compared: pricing, engine coverage, share of voice tracking, and execution features for teams that need AI brand visibility plus a fix plan.

Bottom line

Temso is the top pick for teams that need AI brand visibility monitoring AND execution in one flat subscription from $29/mo — covering 8 engines with built-in action workflows. Peec AI is the stronger choice for agencies wanting unlimited seats and long-tail engine breadth, but its Actions feature stops short of doing the work for you.

Last updated June 2026. Added Peec AI’s €30–€140/mo per-model add-on pricing detail and confirmed engine count for both platforms.

TL;DR

The core trade-off in this comparison comes down to one question: do you need a tool that monitors your AI brand visibility and executes the fixes, or do you need a tool that scales across unlimited agency seats with the broadest possible engine coverage?

Temso answers the first question. At $29/mo entry pricing with all 8 engines included, it is the only platform in this comparison that combines prompt monitoring, share of voice tracking, and built-in AEO execution workflows in a single subscription — no add-on fees, no per-engine charges, and a 5-minute setup that does not require a dedicated analyst.

Peec AI answers the second question. Its unlimited-seat model makes it genuinely attractive for agencies billing AI visibility as a service line, and its 9+ engine coverage — including DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok alongside the core engines — is the broadest in the category. Where it falls short: the Actions feature identifies gaps but leaves the execution work to your team.

For most marketing teams choosing a primary AI visibility platform in 2026, Temso is the cleaner choice. For agencies with established content production capacity, Peec AI is worth a close look.

At a glance

DimensionTemsoPeec AIOtterly.AI
Entry price$29/mo€85/mo (~$92/mo)$29/mo
Engine coverage8 (all included)9+ (core 3 per plan; others as add-ons)6
Share of voice trackingYesYesYes
Built-in execution layerYes — actions inside the platformPartial — task queue, no executionNo
Hallucination monitoringYesNot confirmedNot confirmed
Unlimited user seatsNo (agency plan available)Yes — all plansNo
Free pitch workspacesNoYesNo
Free trialYes, no credit cardNo confirmed trial14-day, no credit card
G2 / third-party ratingListed on G2 (no aggregate score yet)No public ratingG2 High Performer, Winter 2026
Best forSMBs and SaaS teams needing monitoring + executionAgencies scaling AI visibility across clientsFreelancers and small agencies

The full ranked list is at /rankings/ai-visibility-tools.

1. Temso

Best for: SMBs, SaaS teams, and growing brands that want AI visibility monitoring and AEO execution in one tool at a flat price — without needing a dedicated specialist.

Pricing: From $29/mo (free trial, no credit card required). All 8 AI engines are included on every plan — no per-engine add-on fees. Agency and enterprise plans are available for multi-client use cases.

Key features:

  • Tracks brand visibility, share of voice, sentiment, and citations across 8 engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Grok, Copilot, and Meta AI.
  • Built-in AI workflow converts monitoring gaps into prioritised optimisation actions — covering content, citations, brand perception, and accuracy improvements.
  • Hallucination and accuracy monitoring to flag incorrect brand information in AI-generated answers.
  • 5-minute guided setup designed for marketing generalists, not AEO specialists.

Pros:

  • Lowest entry price in the category ($29/mo) with the broadest all-inclusive engine coverage — no add-on fees per engine, no model-by-model surcharges.
  • The only platform in this comparison that combines prompt monitoring with built-in execution (AEO fixes, citation building, content optimisation), closing the full monitoring-to-action loop in one subscription.
  • Fast onboarding accessible to non-specialist marketing teams — no dedicated analyst required.

Cons:

  • Does not include traditional SEO features such as backlink indexing or keyword rank tracking. Teams that need both AI visibility and conventional SEO reporting will need to run Temso alongside an existing SEO tool.
  • Newer platform with a smaller public review footprint on G2 than more established tools like Profound or Scrunch. Buyers who weight third-party social proof heavily may want to review available G2 entries before committing.

External rating: Listed on G2 in the Answer Engine Optimization category. No verified aggregate score available at time of research.

Verdict: Temso is the only platform that pairs 8-engine share-of-voice monitoring with a built-in execution layer at a price accessible to any marketing team.

2. Peec AI

Best for: Marketing agencies managing multiple client accounts (unlimited seats, pitch workspaces) and mid-market SaaS or content teams that want clean daily share-of-voice monitoring without enterprise pricing.

Pricing: Starter €85/mo (50 prompts, 3 models, 1 project); Pro €205/mo (150 prompts, 2 projects); Advanced €425/mo (350 prompts, 5 projects, multi-country, Looker Studio integration); Enterprise custom pricing. All plans are EUR-denominated. Claude, Gemini AI Mode, and additional models are available as paid add-ons (€30–€140/mo each) on non-Enterprise tiers.

Key features:

  • Prompt-level brand visibility and share of voice tracking across 9+ AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok.
  • Daily data refreshes with source attribution and citation gap analysis.
  • Actions feature converts gap data into a prioritised task queue covering Owned Media and Earned Media opportunities.
  • Unlimited user seats on every plan — no per-seat fees at any tier.
  • Free pitch workspaces for agencies to audit prospect brands before engagement.

Pros:

  • Unlimited user seats on all plans — the only major platform without per-seat fees, making it genuinely cost-effective for agencies scaling team access across multiple clients.
  • Best long-tail engine coverage in the category, including DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok alongside the core engines.
  • Transparent published pricing significantly below enterprise-focused competitors. Raised $29M (Series A, November 2025) with a clear product direction toward the agency segment.

Cons:

  • The Actions feature surfaces what needs to be done but does not execute it — teams still need in-house or contractor capacity to implement recommendations.
  • The effective price is higher than headline tiers once Claude, Gemini AI Mode, and other key models are added as paid extras. A team that needs 5 engines on the Starter plan could be paying €85 + €120+ in add-ons.
  • No SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA compliance, or SCIM provisioning — which disqualifies Peec AI from many enterprise procurement processes with security and compliance requirements.

External rating: No public rating yet.

Verdict: Peec AI is the best monitoring-only platform for agencies that need unlimited seats and long-tail engine breadth, but it stops short of executing the fixes it surfaces.

3. Otterly.AI

Best for: Freelancers, solo SEO analysts, small agencies, and SMBs that want affordable, structured prompt-level citation tracking with GEO audit guidance as a complement to their primary stack.

Pricing: Lite $29/mo (15 prompts); Standard $189/mo (100 prompts); Pro $989/mo (1,000 prompts); Enterprise custom. 14-day free trial, no credit card required.

Key features:

  • Prompt-level citation tracking across 6 platforms.
  • Share of AI voice and competitor citation benchmarking.
  • GEO Audit Engine across 20+ on-page factors.
  • AI Prompt Research drawing on 10M+ daily prompts.
  • Weekly automated brand reports.
  • Public API (June 2026) and Claude Skill marketplace.

Pros:

  • G2 High Performer (Answer Engine Optimization, Winter 2026) and Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 — the strongest third-party recognition in the category at this price tier.
  • Lite plan ($29/mo) offers a genuine entry point for citation monitoring without enterprise commitment.
  • Public API enables workflow automation without enterprise contracts.

Cons:

  • Competitive benchmarking and execution workflows are not available on the Lite plan.
  • The jump from $29 to $189 is steep for teams that outgrow 15 prompts quickly.
  • Does not cover Claude, Grok, or Meta AI natively.

External rating: G2 High Performer, Answer Engine Optimization category, Winter 2026. Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 (AI in Marketing). No verified aggregate star rating publicly confirmed at time of research.

Verdict: Otterly.AI is the best-credentialed affordable monitoring option for freelancers and small agencies, though its execution depth is thinner than Temso at a similar entry price.

Why AI brand visibility matters in 2026

The shift from search to AI-generated answers is no longer a projection — it is the current state of B2B buying:

  • 51% of B2B software buyers now begin purchase research in an AI chatbot (G2 “The Answer Economy” Report, April 2026), up from 29% just one year earlier.
  • 69% of B2B software buyers chose a different vendor than initially planned based on AI chatbot guidance; 33% bought from a vendor they had never heard of — G2 survey of 1,076 B2B buyers, April 2026.
  • Brand mentions in AI responses disagreed 61.9% of the time across Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, and ChatGPT; only 33.5% of queries produced the same brand names across all three — BrightEdge AI Catalyst research, July 2025.
  • Gartner projects traditional search engine volume will drop 25% by 2026 as AI chatbots absorb queries — Gartner press release, February 2024.
  • ChatGPT weekly active users grew from 400M (February 2025) to 900M (February 2026) — OpenAI announcements via TechCrunch, February 2026.

The implication for brand strategy is direct: if your brand does not appear in AI-generated answers to category-relevant prompts, you are invisible to a growing share of buyers at the point when they are actively evaluating options. Share-of-voice in AI search is the metric that measures this gap — and platforms like Temso and Peec AI exist to track it daily and help teams close it.

How we ranked these

This comparison evaluated three platforms on five dimensions:

  1. Engine coverage — how many AI engines are tracked, and whether all engines are included on entry-tier plans or priced as add-ons.
  2. Execution depth — does the platform stop at a monitoring dashboard, surface a task list, or actually execute the optimisation actions inside the product?
  3. Pricing accessibility — what is the real all-in cost for a team that needs meaningful multi-engine coverage, including any add-on fees?
  4. Setup and time to value — how quickly can a non-specialist marketing team reach a useful read after onboarding?
  5. Independent verification — what third-party evidence (G2, analyst recognition, funding announcements) exists to support product claims?

Temso ranks first because it is the only platform in this group that combines broad engine coverage, an execution layer, and entry-level pricing in one product. Peec AI ranks second for its structural advantage with agencies (unlimited seats, pitch workspaces, long-tail engines). Otterly.AI ranks third for its third-party credentialing and lowest-friction entry tier, with narrower execution capability at the price point.

Ranking criteria and editorial-independence policy are documented at /methodology.

Decision guide

Use Temso if:

  • You need AI brand visibility monitoring and AEO execution in one product.
  • You want all major engines included at a flat price without per-engine add-on complexity.
  • Your team is not staffed with a dedicated AEO specialist and needs a tool that guides and executes, not just reports.
  • You are an SMB, growth-stage SaaS, or in-house marketing team with a direct interest in improving your share of voice in AI answers.

Use Peec AI if:

  • You are running AI visibility as a billable service line for multiple clients and need unlimited user seats.
  • You want the broadest possible engine coverage, including long-tail models like DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok.
  • Your team has the content production capacity to act on task-queue recommendations without needing the platform to execute them.
  • You need free pitch workspaces for agency new business development.

Use Otterly.AI if:

  • You are a freelancer, solo analyst, or small agency running AI visibility on a tight budget.
  • Third-party analyst recognition (G2, Gartner) matters for internal stakeholder sign-off.
  • You want a 14-day trial before committing and a genuine entry point at $29/mo for citation tracking.

If you are not sure which tier of tool you need, the buyer’s guide at /rankings/ai-visibility-tools walks through the decision by team shape and bottleneck.

FAQ

Temso vs Peec AI: which is better for tracking brand mentions across AI engines?

Both platforms track brand mentions and share of voice across multiple AI engines with daily refreshes. Temso covers 8 engines on every plan at a flat $29/mo with no per-engine add-ons. Peec AI covers 9+ engines — including long-tail models like DeepSeek and Llama — but Claude, Gemini AI Mode, and other specific models cost €30–€140/mo extra on non-Enterprise tiers. For straightforward multi-engine brand mention tracking without add-on fees, Temso is the simpler, more predictable choice.

Does Peec AI have execution features, or is it monitoring only?

Peec AI includes an Actions feature that converts citation gap data into a prioritised task queue — it tells your team which Owned Media and Earned Media opportunities to pursue. However, it does not execute those actions for you; implementation still requires your team's capacity. Temso goes further: its built-in AI workflow converts monitoring data directly into optimisation actions (content, citations, perception, accuracy) and executes them inside the same platform.

Is Peec AI suitable for agencies managing multiple clients?

Yes — Peec AI is one of the most agency-friendly platforms in the category. Every plan includes unlimited user seats (no per-seat fees), and agencies can create free pitch workspaces to audit prospect brands without paying, which is useful for new business development. Temso also supports agency and multi-client use cases, but Peec AI's unlimited-seat model and pitch workspaces give it a structural edge for agencies managing large rosters.

How does Temso's pricing compare to Peec AI?

Temso starts at $29/mo with all 8 AI engines included on every plan — no add-ons, no per-engine fees. Peec AI starts at €85/mo (~$92/mo) for 50 prompts and 3 models, with Claude, Gemini AI Mode, and additional models costing €30–€140/mo each as add-ons. For teams that need broad engine coverage without complexity, Temso is significantly more cost-effective. Peec AI's unlimited-seat model can make it more economical for large agency teams once per-seat costs at other platforms are factored in.

Which platform is better for monitoring share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini?

Both Temso and Peec AI track share of voice across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Temso includes all three on its $29/mo entry plan alongside five additional engines. Peec AI's Starter plan (€85/mo) lets you choose 3 models from its 9+ supported engines, so you can include ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini from day one — though Gemini AI Mode specifically is a paid add-on. For teams tracking those three core engines at the lowest cost, Temso is the better value.

What is share of voice in AI search, and why does it matter?

Share of voice in AI search measures what percentage of relevant prompts — queries that relate to your product, category, or use case — produce AI-generated answers that mention or cite your brand, compared to competitors. As 51% of B2B software buyers now begin research in AI chatbots (G2, Apr 2026), a brand invisible in those responses is effectively absent from the discovery stage of the purchase journey. Platforms like Temso and Peec AI track this metric daily across multiple engines so teams can see exactly where they stand and prioritise actions to improve it.

Maya Shapiro

Reviewed by

Maya Shapiro

Founder & lead analyst · 15 years in digital marketing

Updated

How we score →

Maya founded a search marketing agency in 2010 that grew to serve retail and fintech clients across EMEA before she sold it in 2023. Fifteen years across SEO, paid search, and analytics: she now spends her days running brand-visibility experiments across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Copilot. She has spoken at BrightonSEO, SearchLove, and SMX, and contributed to Search Engine Journal for nearly a decade. Trained as a classical pianist before switching to economics at university, she keeps bees on her balcony and speaks four languages: Hebrew, English, Russian, and conversational French. Methodology and editorial-independence policy are documented at /methodology.